Legal Opinion
Fagerberg v. Denny
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1941No. Civil No. 4274PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
This is an action by W. C. Denny, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Dixon Fagerberg, hereinafter called defendant. It is based upon section 1884, Revised Code of 1928, which reads as follows:
“Usury prohibited; penalty. No person shall directly or indirectly take or receive in money, goods, or things in action, or in any other way, any greater sum or any greater value for the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action, than ten dollars on one hundred dollars for one year; any person contracting for, reserving or receiving, directly or indirectly, any greater sum or value,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Covington v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- First National Bank v. WaddellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Blaisdell v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Britz v. KinsvaterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Small v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Houchard v. BermanArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- In re Maryvale Community Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1969
- In the Matter of Maryvale Community Hospital, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Debtor. Health Facilities Planning Council, an Arizona Nonprofit Corporation v. Frank J. Dunning, as Trustee of the Estate of Said Debtor, Gary K. Nelson, the Attorney General of the State of Arizona v. Frank J. Dunning, as Trustee of the Estate of Said DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.