Hill v. Bell Discount Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
Plaintiffs cross-appeal from a judgment in their favor, on the ground that the damages awarded them are inadequate. This is the sole question for determination, since defendant-appellant has abandoned its appeal.
Plaintiffs brought this action in equity to restrain the continuing use of a wage assignment which was executed by them as part of a conditional sales agreement for the purchase of an automobile. The court entered a decree cancelling the instrument and permanently enjoining defendant from its use, and retained jurisdiction to assess damages. After hearing evidence, the court assessed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelly v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- McCullagh v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Carmen v. Fox Film Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Slater v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stevenson v. ITT Harper, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Scheinfeld v. Muntz TV, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Munoz v. Expedited Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991