Legal Opinion

Hill v. Bell Discount Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 25, 1963No. Gen. 48,808PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

Plaintiffs cross-appeal from a judgment in their favor, on the ground that the damages awarded them are inadequate. This is the sole question for determination, since defendant-appellant has abandoned its appeal.

Plaintiffs brought this action in equity to restrain the continuing use of a wage assignment which was executed by them as part of a conditional sales agreement for the purchase of an automobile. The court entered a decree cancelling the instrument and permanently enjoining defendant from its use, and retained jurisdiction to assess damages. After hearing evidence, the court assessed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. McCullagh v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Carmen v. Fox Film Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Slater v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. ITT Harper, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Scheinfeld v. Muntz TV, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. Munoz v. Expedited Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API