Legal Opinion

Carmen v. Fox Film Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The action is at law for damages sustained by reason of the defendant’s wrongful interference with the plaintiff’s employment under a contract with the Frank A. Keeney Pictures Corporation.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, a motion picture actress, on March 28, 1918, entered into a contract with the Keeney corporation, whereby said corporation agreed to employ her as a motion picture star actress for a term of two years commencing July 15, 1918. At the time of the execution of the contract the plaintiff was a minor, but she attained her majority on July 13, *7781918, two days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schwab v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local No. 782Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  2. Buchanan Home & Auto Supply Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
  3. Hilton v. Sheridan Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Hill v. Bell Discount Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Hayes v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API