Carmen v. Fox Film Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Page, J.:
The action is at law for damages sustained by reason of the defendant’s wrongful interference with the plaintiff’s employment under a contract with the Frank A. Keeney Pictures Corporation.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, a motion picture actress, on March 28, 1918, entered into a contract with the Keeney corporation, whereby said corporation agreed to employ her as a motion picture star actress for a term of two years commencing July 15, 1918. At the time of the execution of the contract the plaintiff was a minor, but she attained her majority on July 13, *7781918, two days…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schwab v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local No. 782Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Buchanan Home & Auto Supply Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Hilton v. Sheridan Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Hill v. Bell Discount Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- Hayes v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.