Legal Opinion

Santo v. Maynard

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 4, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action for damages for an injury to the plaintiff and his property from the unlawful and negligent act of the defendant ; brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New London County, and tried to the court, upon a general denial, before Crump, J. Facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLoomis, J.

This is an action to recover damages for an injury to the plaintiff and his horse, wagon and harness, caused by his horse, while he was driving it, taking fright at a pile of wood left by the defendant near the traveled path in a public highway.

The contention before this court relates to the admission of evidence, to the allowance of an amendment to the complaint which obviated the defendant’s objection to the evidence, and to the refusal of the court to allow the defendant to file a new answer to the amended complaint and try the case anew.

The complaint at first simply charged that the wood…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bateson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Jones v. LoudermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  4. Bennett v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Barber's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Banks v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Reaney v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Woodruff v. PerrottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API