Legal Opinion
In re Del Valle Ruiz
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided October 19, 2018No. 18 Misc. 85 (ER), 18 Misc. 127 (ER)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.
Petitioners in the above-captioned actions have applied for court orders to conduct discovery for use in foreign proceedings, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1782. Petitioners in both actions seek discovery against Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Holdings U.S.A., Inc., and Santander Bank N.A (collectively, "Santander"). Petitioners in one of the actions also seek an order to conduct discovery against Santander Investment Securities Inc. For the reasons set forth below, Petitioners' applications are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Banco…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- BNSF Ry. Co. v. TyrrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re del Valle RuizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Filsoof v. Wheelock Street Capital, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- George Moudreas & Co SA v. Jinhai Intelligent Manufacturing Co LtdDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- In re: Ex Parte Application of Marwin Darwish for Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 in Aid of Foreign ProceedingsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025