Urban Renewal Agency of City of Lubbock v. Trammel
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Justice.
Plaintiff below, The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Lubbock, appellant here, filed its statement in writing as provided for by Article 3264, Vernon’s Ann. Tex.Civ.St., to condemn under the right of eminent domain, and acquire thereby fee simple title to a tract of land owned by D. P. Trammel and wife, Kathryn Trammel, and leased to various tenants, including ap-pellee, Harold Deering. From the award of Special Commissioners, appeal was perfected to the County Court of Law No. 2 of Lubbock County and tried to a jury. In the answer to special issues inquiring as to the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N v. HaywoodTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. HeringTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Wade v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Urban Renewal Agency v. TrammelTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Mueller v. Central Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Noyes v. JackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- City of Amarillo v. BettsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968