Legal Opinion

Widtfeldt v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 2, 2015No. 14-8PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiff; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Failure to State a Claim; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); 26 U.S.C. § 6511; 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a); 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1) Frivolous Complaint Filed by Suspended Attorney; History of Abuse of Court System; Costs to Defendant

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Before the court is defendant’s motion to-dismiss plaintiffs pro se complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), respectively, of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Noffke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Widtfeldt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Brandt Development v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  4. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API