Widtfeldt v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Failure to State a Claim; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); 26 U.S.C. § 6511; 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a); 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1) Frivolous Complaint Filed by Suspended Attorney; History of Abuse of Court System; Costs to Defendant
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Before the court is defendant’s motion to-dismiss plaintiffs pro se complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), respectively, of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Noffke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Widtfeldt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Brandt Development v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025