Legal Opinion
Widtfeldt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 12, 2016No. 2015-5128UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
James Widtfeldt (‘Widtfeldt”), an attorney proceeding pro se, appeals from the final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“the Claims Court”) dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Widtfeldt v. United States, 122 Fed.Cl. 158 (2015); see also Appellant’s App. (“A.A.”) 1-9. Because the Claims Court did not err in dismissing the complaint, we affirm.
Baokgeound
The facts of this case as reported by Widtfeldt are not entirely clear; indeed, the Claims Court noted that Widtfeldt’s complaint was “unintelligible and convoluted,” and that it was required…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Jimmie Ann Taylor, Ladell Vasicek, Noma Chriss, Martha Cole, and Sara M. McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Sig and Barbara Shore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Noffke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016