Legal Opinion
TAY v. GREEN
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 2022PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAY v. GREEN
2022 OK 37
508 P.3d 431
Case Number: 119927; Comp. w/119984
Decided: 04/19/2022
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cite as: 2022 OK 37, 508 P.3d 431
PAUL TAY, Petitioner,
v.
JED GREEN and KRISTOPHER MASTERMAN, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TO DETERMINE THE CONSTITUTIONAL
VALIDITY OF STATE QUESTION NO. 818, INITIATIVE PETITION
NO. 432.
¶0 This original proceeding declares a challenge against the legal sufficiency of State Question No. 818, Initiative Petition No. 432. State Question 818, Petition No. 432 seeks to create a new article to the Oklahoma Constitution, Article 31, which…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- McGirt v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 344, State Question No. 630Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ALLISON v. MCCOY-POSTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2026
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2023