Gaut v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of uttering a forged instrument in writing, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years; hence this appeal.
The indictment contains several counts, and the conviction was on the second count. Appellant moved to- quash the same on the ground that it shows it was intended to be the act of a different person than that charged in the indictment. The second count in the indictment sets out the uttering of a certain forged instrument by appellant to J. W. Pier-son, upon which the prosecution is predicated, which is set…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Rodifer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Bloch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.