Legal Opinion

Iqbal v. Bryson

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 26, 2009No. Civil Action 2:08cv104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Javaid Iqbal’s (“Petitioner”) Motion for Summary Judgment and Tony R. Bryson and Emilio T. Gonzalez’s (“Respondents”) Joint Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ pleadings, the Court finds this matter ripe for judicial determination. For the reasons below Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petitione…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Berenyi v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. William R. Haulbrook v. Michelin North America,incorporated Michelin Americas Research & Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vijaya Boggala v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. MOHAMEDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  3. Hassan v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  4. Tung v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. Ohene v. ZanottiDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API