Legal Opinion
MOHAMED
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2017No. ID 3900PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 92
(BIA 2017) Interim Decision #3900 Matter of Ali Mohamed MOHAMED, Respondent Decided September 5, 2017 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Entry into a pretrial intervention agreement under Texas law qualifies as a “conviction” for immigration purposes under section 101(a)(48)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A) (2012), where (1) a respondent admits sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt at the time of his entry into the agreement, and (2) a judge authorizes an agreement…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Burgess v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hector Tito Lujan-Armendariz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Mauro Roldan-Santoyo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Loughrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- OZKOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- ROLDANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fernando Diaz-Quirazco v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- NAVARRO GUADARRAMABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- Ali v. ReitherDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Audrey Grant v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Ex Parte: Jesus Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.