Legal Opinion

Dreiman v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1992No. 91-80PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellant Karl Dreiman was convicted of burglary and sentenced to three to five years in prison. The sentence was suspended, and he was placed on three years probation. Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence claiming insufficient evidence of intent to steal at the time of entry necessary for a burglary conviction.

We affirm the conviction and remand the sentencing orders for corrections.

Appellant presents the following issues for our determination:

“I. Was the evidence sufficient to convict Appellant of burglary or did the evidence merely support criminal entry?
“II. Was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. George E. Girard, Jr., Paul A. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Israel G. GrossmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Browder v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Wehr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Murray v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API