Legal Opinion
Breza v. Kiffmeyer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 16, 2006No. A06-1871PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Tim Breza and twelve other individuals filed a petition, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 204B.44(a) (2004), 1 to enjoin respondent Maty Kiffmeyer, the Minnesota Secretary of State, from proceeding with the general election on a proposed constitutional amendment to dedicate and allocate revenue from the motor vehicle sales tax (MVST). Petitioners claim that the ballot question on the amendment is unconstitutionally misleading as it relates to the allocation of MVST revenues between public transit and highways. On October 26, 2006, we denied the petition and indicated that an opinion would…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Stearns v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- State ex rel. Marr v. StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Peterson v. StaffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Winters v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. Duluth & Northern Minnesota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
4Cited by6 opinions
- League of Women Voters Minnesota v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Wisconsin Justice Initiative, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Limmer v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Indigenous Lifeways v. N.M. Compilation Comm'n Advisory Comm.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2023
- League of Women Voters Minnesota v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.