Legal Opinion
Butterfield v. Oculus Contact Lens Company
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 6, 1971No. 69 C 1812 (and related cases)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
These consolidated eases came on for trial before the Court and the Court having heard the evidence, considered the briefs and arguments of counsel for the parties and been fully advised in the premises, makes the following narrative, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as part of its opinion.
All of the cases are similar in that they are actions for infringement of U. S. Patent No. 2,544,246 (hereinafter the “Butterfield patent”) which was issued to plaintiff March 6, 1951 and expired March 6, 1968. It has been owned by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Amphenol Corporation, a Corporation of Delaware v. General Time Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Buckeye Steel Castings CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Diapulse Corporation of America v. Carba, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
- Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. So Good Potato Chip CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.