Searcy v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, summary judgment will be granted in favor of the United States. 1
I. BACKGROUND
Although plaintiff finds fault with a number of policies of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), only his challenge to the policy prohibiting an inmate from sharing his telephone access code with another inmate need be addressed here. As discussed below, this is the only claim for which plaintiff has exhausted his available administrative remedies.
1.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aref v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Scott v. ConleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Aref v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011