Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Perry Drugs Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 3, 1991No. 1-90-0370PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan

The plaintiff, Walton Fitzpatrick, filed a complaint under the Structural Work Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 48, par. 60 et seq.) (the Act) for personal injuries against the owner of the work site, the defendant, Perry Drugs Company (Perry). The trial judge granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the record showed, as a matter of law, that the defendant was not in charge of the work as required by section 9 of the Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 48, par. 69.

Perry owned a building at 95th and Damen in Chicago that was to be remodeled into one of its retail…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Union Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Norton v. Wilbur Waggoner Equipment Rental and Excavating Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Emberton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Johnson v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Lyle v. SesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Block v. LOHAN ASSOCIATES, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Slavoljub Damnjanovic and Seretena Damnjanovic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Apostal v. Oliveri Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Donald P. Lulich v. The Sherwin-Williams Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Manisca v. Rakstang Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API