Legal Opinion

Manisca v. Rakstang Associates, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 18, 1993No. 1-93-0278PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

The plaintiffs filed a single-count complaint against the defendant, Rakstang Associates, Inc. (Rakstang), seeking recovery under the Structural Work Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 48, par. 60 et seq.) for the death of Michael A. Stanislawski. Rakstang moved for summary judgment pursuant to section 2 — 1005 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, par. 2 — 1005), contending that it was not in charge of the work being performed by Stanislawski at the time of his death and, as a consequence, it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The trial court granted Rakstang’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larson v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Murphy v. UrsoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Kolakowski v. VorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. NAT. ADVERTISING CO.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Welliver v. AlbertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Hesselink v. R.L. Perlow Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API