Legal Opinion

Wimberly v. Parrish

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1960No. 461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

When, at the close of the evidence, the court intimated it would give the jury peremptory instructions to find for the defendants, the plaintiffs then had the option of waiting for the instructions, excepting to them and to the judgment and then appeal. Or, they could submit to a nonsuit and appeal. They chose the latter course. The procedure followed is amply supported by our decisions. Justice Denny, in Rochlin v. Construction Co., 234 N.C. 443, 67 S.E. 2d 464, states the rule: “And where a judge intimates an opinion on the law which lies at the foundation of the action, adverse to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Finlay v. King's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Hall v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Adams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Brittain v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Brittain v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. McCracken v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Strickland v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Rancho Del Villacito Condominiums, Inc. v. WeisfeldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Rutledge v. FeherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API