Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Williams

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Smith District Court. The nature of the action, and the facts, appear in the opinion. At the May Term, 1882, of the district court, defendant Williams recovered a judgment against plaintiff Thompson, who brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

*115The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action of replevin, brought by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, in the district court of Smith county. The case was tried before a jury; verdict and judgment were in favor of the defendant, and plaintiff alleges error. The defendant objects to the consideration of the record, on the ground that the original case-made and not a copy is filed in this court, citing General Statutes, chapter 80, §548. The law referred to has been amended, and now it is the original rather than a copy which must be filed in this court. (Laws 1877,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Bemis v. BeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  3. Missouri & Kansas Transportation Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  4. Simpson v. WrennIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Vosburgh v. HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Hepler State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Cohen v. JackoboiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Pierson v. Kingman Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Brooks v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. Crider v. City Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API