Legal Opinion

Crider v. City Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1915No. 6239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari; from Paulding superior court — Judge Price Edwards. October 20, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

With a single exception, none of the points which the plaintiff in error sought to have adjudicated by certiorari are so presented as to permit them to be considered. A number of rulings which, according to the allegations of the petition for certiorari, *378were prima facie erroneous, were not referred to in the answer of the magistrate who tried the case. If the petitioner in certiorari had wished these points to be considered by the judge of the superior court, timely exceptions to the answer of the magistrate should have been filed as to each of the assignments of error in the petition as to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Sargeant v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Thompson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. J. M. High Co. v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Cass v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mackle Construction Co. v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. State v. La PointeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Allen v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Flag Fish Company Inc. v. Mann Seafood Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API