Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 2, 2009No. 08-1192, 08-1543, 08-1694PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

We consider in this case the appeals of three defendants convicted of conspiring to sell crack cocaine in southern Illinois. Only Damian James challenges his conviction, and we find there was no Speedy Trial Act violation in his case because, after excluding the time attributable to the continuances James himself requested, his trial commenced in a timely fashion. We also conclude that sufficient evidence supported his conviction for conspiring to sell crack cocaine as he pooled his money with others to buy crack that all knew would be resold, was dependent on others…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Karl CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. PansierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Rondale ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. EtchinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. SalemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API