Legal Opinion
Lyman County v. Whitbeck
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1929No. File No. 6663PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. The defendants W'hitbeck and Holmes were copartners engaged in the banking business under the firm name and style of Whitbeck & Holmes, Bankers. The defendants Ketelson, Sletto, McLarnan, and Casey are sureties on a bond furnished by Whitbeck & Holmes, Bankers, as depositaries of the county funds of Lyman County. The complaint alleges:
“That said bank by and through its officers had heretofore, to wit: on March 24, 1925, made a written application, duly filed in the Auditor’s office on March 31, 1925, to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Barnes v. BrookmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Manitowoc County v. TrumanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Farmers State Bank v. Ed Cox & SonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Board of Education of the Independent School District v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Ruden v. City of PlatteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Davison County v. Western Natl. BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Hughes County v. Security State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.