Pratt v. Welcome
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, denying a motion for a new trial. D. K. Trask, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action of claim and delivery to recover possession of a mare alleged in the complaint to be of the value of $500 and for $200 damages.
Judgment was for plaintiff for $1 damages, for the possession of the mare, or in case delivery cannot be had, for her value, fixed at $300, and for costs of suit. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The errors relied upon for a reversal of the judgment appear to be such only as properly should be considered on the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial: Insufficiency of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Haight v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. SeidellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Katz v. People's Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. BroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hutchison v. BarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Evans v. Silver Bow Motor Car Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.