Legal Opinion
Ticey v. Randolph
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 21, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 341PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to set aside a judgment against the appellants, Elizabeth Ticey and Preston Jackson. The judgment was by default in the amount of $124,092.19 and is predicated upon the alleged negligence of the defendants in the operation of a motor vehicle in Pinal County, Arizona.
Service of process was attempted upon the defendants in several ways, but the order below is now defended on appeal only on the basis of service by publication in pursuance of Rule.4(e) (3), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., which reads :
“4(e) (3) Summons: service by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- D. W. Onan & Sons, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Harrison v. HanveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Biaett v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Price v. SunmasterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- O'LEARY v. Superior Court of Gila CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Master Financial, Inc. v. WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Mervyn's, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985