Ephamka v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
On April 7, 1992, the District Attorney’s Office presented the Bethel grand jury with a proposed indictment charging Nick J. Ep-hamka, Jr. with second-degree sexual assault, AS 11.41.420(a)(3)(B). The grand jury, after hearing the government’s evidence, returned a “no true bill” — that is, the grand jury voted not to indict Ephamka. Three days later, on April 10, the district attorney’s office asked the Bethel superior court for permission to resubmit the case to the grand jury. Over Ephamka’s objection, Superior Court Judge Dale O. Curda granted the government’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. ZirpolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People Ex Rel. Flinn v. BarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- People v. DykesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StokesOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- McRae v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
- State v. FollinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. FollinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002