Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stratton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1992No. S-4153PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

INTRODUCTION

This appeal of a dismissal raises the issue of whether Alaska’s savings statute applies to an action which is refiled within one year after being dismissed for failure to prosecute. The superior court dismissed the Smiths’ complaint, finding that it was time-barred by the statute of limitations and that Alaska’s savings statute, AS 09.-10.240, did not apply. The superior court *1163also rejected the Smiths’ equitable estoppel arguments against application of the statute of limitations.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On November 30, 1984, Barbara Stratton…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Groseth v. NessAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hatley v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Charles Furnald v. Anthony Hughes and Emcasco Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Prazak v. Local 1 International Union of Bricklayers & Allied CraftsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. American Marine Corporation v. SholinAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API