Legal Opinion
Rose v. City of Mulberry, Arkansas
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 9, 2008No. 07-1645PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Thomas Matthew Rose sued the city of Mulberry, Arkansas, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1988, for violating his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Rose appeals from the adverse jury verdict on his claim, arguing that the district court 1 erred in several of its rulings. We affirm.
As Rose was passing through Mulberry on Interstate Highway 40 on August 1, 2005, Mulberry police officer Robert Lim-bocker stopped him for driving twenty-two miles per hour over the speed limit. Rose denied Limbocker’s request to search his vehicle. Two other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Virginia v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Robert Oglesby v. Amy LesanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Marksmeier v. DavieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Thomas v. City of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Engleman v. Deputy MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.