Legal Opinion
United States v. James B. Frost (89-5144/5145) and Charles L. Griffin (89-5146/5147)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1990No. 89-5144, 89-5145, 89-5146 and 89-5147PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
Defendants James B. Frost and Charles L. Griffin appeal their convictions for conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, bribery of a bank officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 215 and 2, and misapplication of bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 656 and 2. We conclude that the evidence supports the convictions of both defendants. The district court did not abuse its discretion and the conduct of the prosecutors did not rise to the level of a constitutional violation. We have carefully considered all arguments raised by defendants and find them to be meritless. For the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- United States v. Roy C. Blakeney (90-5664), Kenneth A. Kutnyak (90-5665), and James E. Box (90-6041)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. John R. Prince (98-6361), Tony White (98-6362)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Marie Antoinette Jackson-RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Keith Sherlin (94-6111) and Tracy Teague (94-6112)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Kenneth King Kewin King, Kewin King, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.