Legal Opinion
United States v. Marie Antoinette Jackson-Randolph
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 2, 2002No. 00-1073PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Marie Antoinette Jackson-Randolph appeals her conviction for conspiracy to commit program fraud and mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; program fraud, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1760(g); mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341; embezzlement/conversion of $5,000 or more from a program receiving federal funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666; and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i). For the following reasons, we affirm Jackson-Randolph’s conviction and the majority of her sentence, but remand to the district court for…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. TurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GreenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Anna TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.