Swolsky Enterprises v. Halterman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This case comes before this court on appeal from judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas.
This case involves a claim for unemployment compensation which arose as a result of the following circumstances. Claimant-appellee Randy J. Halterman was employed as a stock boy by appellant, Swolsky Enterprises, d.b.a. King Liquidators, an operator of discount retail outlets. Prior to hiring the claimant, appellant required the claimant to sign a standard company contract in which claimant agreed to “* * * voluntarily submit to a polygraph test if circumstances should arise which, in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eshelman v. BlubaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Charles Livingston & Sons, Inc. v. ConstanceOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
- City of Sioux City v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Swope v. Florida Indus. Com'n Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Valley Vendors, Inc. v. JamiesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Warrensville Heights v. JenningsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Vaughan v. Shop & Go, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987