Legal Opinion

Swolsky Enterprises v. Halterman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1983No. L-83-111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This case comes before this court on appeal from judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas.

This case involves a claim for unemployment compensation which arose as a result of the following circumstances. Claimant-appellee Randy J. Halterman was employed as a stock boy by appellant, Swolsky Enterprises, d.b.a. King Liquidators, an operator of discount retail outlets. Prior to hiring the claimant, appellant required the claimant to sign a standard company contract in which claimant agreed to “* * * voluntarily submit to a polygraph test if circumstances should arise which, in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eshelman v. BlubaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Charles Livingston & Sons, Inc. v. ConstanceOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. City of Sioux City v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Swope v. Florida Indus. Com'n Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Valley Vendors, Inc. v. JamiesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Warrensville Heights v. JenningsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Vaughan v. Shop & Go, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API