Legal Opinion

City of Warrensville Heights v. Jennings

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1991No. 89-2096PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

On an appeal from the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, a common pleas court must affirm the decision of the board unless it is “unlawful, unreasonable, or against the manifest weight of the evidence * * *.” R.C. 4141.28(0). We hold that the common pleas court abused its discretion in affirming the board’s order. Jennings was discharged for “just cause” and he is therefore disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation.

R.C. 4141.29(D)(2)(a) generally precludes an award of unemployment compensation benefits for a person who has “quit his work without just cause or has been…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Williams v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. Mole (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Puterbaugh v. Goodwill Industries of the Miami Valley, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Appeal of WatermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Pica Corp., Inc. v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API