City of Sioux City v. Fairbanks
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
REES, Justice.
This is an appeal by the City of Sioux City (hereinafter City) from the ruling and judgment of the district court reinstating plaintiff Robert V. Fairbanks to his position as Auto Mechanic I with the City. Fairbanks had been discharged for refusing to submit to a polygraph examination regarding the disappearance of four tires from the City’s maintenance garage where he was employed. His discharge on this ground was affirmed by a divided Sioux City Civil Service Commission. Appeal from the Commission’s decision was made to the district court pursuant to section 400.27, The Code…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- DeVito v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Coursey v. Board Fire & Police Com'rs of SkokieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Millsap v. Cedar Rapids Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Molino v. Board of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Long Beach City Employees Assn. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Sieg v. CIV. SERV. COM'N OF WEST DES MOINESSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- State v. LoseeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Haldeman v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.