Legal Opinion

Intelligent Investments Corp. v. Gonzales

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided June 14, 2016No. BV031101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KUMAR, Acting P. J.

—Defendant and appellant Miguel Gonzales appeals the court’s denial of his motion for attorney fees after the voluntary dismissal by plaintiff and respondent Intelligent Investments Corporation of its unlawful detainer action. Defendant contends he was entitled to attorney fees pursuant to the fee shifting provision under Los Angeles Municipal Code (sometimes Municipal Code) section 162.09.A.5, which applies to unlawful detainer actions involving property in the City of Los Angeles’s rent escrow account program *Supp. 3(REAP), and therefore Civil Code section 1717,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Heather Farms Homeowners Assn. v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yanez v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API