Legal Opinion
In Re River Princess Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 6, 1991No. 16-10416PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION TO PERFECT MARITIME LIEN IN ADMIRALTY
HOWARD SCHWARTZBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
The movant, American Application Associates of Fairfield, Inc. (“American”), contends that if a craft looks like a vessel, floats like a vessel and is named like a vessel, it must be a vessel that is subject to a maritime lien for materials furnished to convert it to a floating restaurant. Because the vessel lacks liquid assets and is sinking financially, American has moved for permission to perfect and enforce its asserted maritime lien in admiralty for necessaries…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Interpool Limited v. Char Yigh Marine (Panama) S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- JC Penney-Gwinn Corporation v. McArdleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
- Hayford v. DoussonyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
- The ArkDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harbour Lights Marina, Inc. v. WandstratDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
- Couri v. Fisher (In Re JCC Capital Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Bavely v. Wandstrat (In Re Harbour Lights Marina, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- International Fidelity Insurance v. Robb (In Re Robb)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992