Legal Opinion
The Ark
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 15, 1926No. 2282PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALL, District Judge.
This cause comes on for final hearing upon the libel, interventions filed, and testimony taken herein,
January 21, 1926, the Electrical Construction Company filed its libel against the boat, claiming $3,600.97 for labor and materials furnished the boat in repairs. A claim was interposed on February 8th by Rose Stein, and bond given. On the same day an answer was filed, setting up that the party in possession of the boat was in such possession by reason of a lease, which lease has been forfeited and has expired. She admits the presence of the boat in the harbor; puts in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cope v. Vallette Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Tebo v. Mayor of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thomas W. Griffith v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation and American Commercial Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Farwest Steel Corp. v. Barge Sea-Span 241Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- The ShowboatDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
- Miami River Boat Yard, Inc. v. 60' Houseboat, Serial Sc-40-2860-3-62Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Campbell v. Loznicka. The ScorpioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.