Legal Opinion

Herr v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 23, 1994No. 13038-0-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

The trial court determined that Joe W. Herr failed to raise sufficient facts in this Department of Labor and Industries appeal to submit the case to a jury and dismissed the action. Mr. Herr contends: (1) the trial court erroneously applied an overly stringent standard in defining disability; and (2) the evidence was adequate to frame a jury question. We affirm.

Mr. Herr worked as a machinist for 22 years. In 1985 he began experiencing skin lesions and was diagnosed with eczematous dermatitis primarily affecting his hands and feet. His physician attributed the condition to exposure to oils and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leeper v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lightle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Spring v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hunter v. Bethel School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. OverdorffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McIndoe v. Department of LaborWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. McIndoe v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Adams v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. O'Keefe v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Butson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API