Legal Opinion

Cole & Blocker v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Fannin. Tried below before Hon. Ben H. Denton.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

Appellees sued to recover -damages for the death of-'their son, which was alleged to have occurred from the negligent construction and operation of an electric light plant operated by appellants and their agents in the town of Honey Grove. Defendant answered by general denial, and specially plead contributory negligence.

The testimony is that, the town of Honey Grove put in an electric light plant for lighting its streets and to furnish lights to its inhabitants for hire, and operated it for two or three years, and on September 1, 1899, leased it to appellants to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International & G. N. R. R. v. KindredTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hendrick v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hargrave v. Vaughn & CummingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Biggins v. RaischCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BallewTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. English v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Rodgers v. TobiasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Standard Light & Power Co. v. MunceyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. Smith Et Ux. v. FarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API