Dunn v. Vaughan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MAXEV, C.
This is-ah action on a- promissory note for $600 given as part pasunent on a tractor. The execution of the note is admitted, but the defendant sets up as a defense that Ihe tractor was defective, and finally blew up, and defendant was unable to use it afterwards. Defendant also filed a cross-petition, wherein he sought to recover back the money he had paid. The testimony shows that E. O. Dunn bought this tractor from James D. Vaughan; that Vaughan had been demonstrating with the tractor in the neighborhood for something like a year, and that the price of it was $1,385, but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woolsey v. ZieglarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Frey v. FailesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- International Harvester Co. v. LawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Standard Sewing MacH. Co. v. New State Shirt & Overall Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Pauls Valley Milling Co. v. GabbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Luke v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Abbott v. PeppersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932