Miethke v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Bespondents are nurserymen and are owners of a growing nursery stock in Pierce county. Pierce county assessed and levied a tax on their nursery stock as personal property, and this action was begun by respondents to recover money paid under protest to the county for personal taxes which respondents claim were wrongfully assessed and levied hy the county upon certain shrubs, trees and plants cultivated and growing upon their land.
They allege in their complaint that they are the owners of a certain tract of land situated in Pierce county upon which, during the year 1931, they were growing a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Churchill v. AckermanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Cottle v. SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Board of Trade v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stiner v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Unemployment Compensation Department v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Town of Needham v. Winslow Nurseries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Julius Roehrs Co. v. DIV. OF TAX APPEALS, DEPT. OF TREASURYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Dowd v. Board of Appeals of DoverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.