Legal Opinion

Lewiston Water & Power Co. v. County of Asotin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1901No. 3553PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Asotin County. — Hon. Melvin M. Godman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Appellant commenced suit to enjoin the collection of a tax of $256.60, levied upon its capital stock, assessed at a valuation of $10,000, for the year 1897. The complaint substantially states that appellant is a domestic corporation with a capital stock of $250,000. The corporation was formed for the purpose of acquiring and conveying water by conduits through pipes and canals on *373Asotin creek, in Asotin county, to and upon adjacent lands, for irrigation and domestic uses and for manufacturing purposes; to generate electric and other power…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People ex rel. Burke v. BadlamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Benn v. County of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Commercial Electric Light & Power Co. v. JudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wolfe v. ParmenterWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wingfield v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. McCornick & Co. v. BassettUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Weatherford Milling Co. v. Duncan, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API