Legal Opinion
Vanderhorst Corporation of America v. Chromium Corporation of America
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 21, 1952No. 178, Docket 22245PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The opinion of the District Court is reported in 98 F.Supp. 412, and contains a very full statement of the issues involved, the facts found and the supporting evidence; we shall assume an acquaintance with it in what we say, and we do not think it necessary to repeat its substance. Moreover, we shall confine our discussion to only one of the issues decided below, for, even though we should hold with the plaintiff on all other issues, the judgment would have to be affirmed, if, as we believe, the claims in suit are invalid because they are not for any patentable ad-vanee…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Western States MacH. Co. v. S. S. Hepworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Foxboro Co. v. Taylor Instrument CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- United Lens Corporation v. Doray Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Cowles Co. v. Frost-White Paper MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Sperry Rand Corporation, in 13,678 v. Knapp-Monarch Company, in 13,679Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.