Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Ghee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1964No. 172Published

1Per curiam

In the record there is no answer by defendant Calbert Johnson. No issue was submitted as to him. He and his wife testified as witnesses for plaintiff.

Defendant Ghee assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of involuntary nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence. In his brief his contention is that plaintiff is guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The term “contributory negligence” ex vi termini implies or presupposes negligence on the part of defendant in an action for damages. Darden v. Leemaster, 238 N.C. 573, 78 S.E. 2d 448.

Defendant Ghee may…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API