Legal Opinion

Roy v. Roy

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1938No. Civ. 2191PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for divorce on the ground of cruelty, a large number of specific incidents being set forth in the complaint. It was alleged that the parties had acquired as community property various parcels of real estate and certain personal property, including stocks, bonds and securities. It was then alleged in paragraph V of the complaint that during the course of their married life and since 1929 the plaintiff had intrusted to the defendant money, stocks, bonds and securities worth approximately $50,000, which was the separate property of the plaintiff, which was still in possession…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Callnon v. CallnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Reid v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Marriage of Garrity and BishtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Spahn v. SpahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API