Legal Opinion

Cripe v. Wade

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note. Three defenses were interposed: (1) fraud, (2) conditional delivery, (3) failure of consideration. Defendant alleged that he had no plain, adequate and complete remedy at law and prayed for a decree that the note be delivered into court and canceled as null and void. Upon stipulation, the cause was submitted to the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the amount due on the note and for attorney’s fees. Defendant appeals.

This note was given in payment for the one-half interest which plaintiff owned in a mercantile…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Fuller v. PercivalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Ward v. JensonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Shain v. BelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bell v. SpainOregon Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller Et Ux. v. Protrka Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Cawrse v. American Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Johnson v. CurlOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Johnson v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Stovall v. NewellOregon Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API