Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Curl

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover on a promissory note alleged to have been executed on November 1, 1929, and dated September 20 of the same year, for the principal sum of $1,726.62 with interest from date at the rate of six per cent per annum, less $50 paid on the note on August 27, 1931, and reasonable attorneys’ fee.

The defendant in his answer denies that the note was executed on November 1, 1929, and alleges that he made, executed and delivered the same to the plaintiff on September 20, 1929. He denies the payment thereon of $50.

As a further and separate answer and defense and as ground for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cripe v. WadeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. United States Rubber Co. v. KimseyOregon Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dant & Russell, Inc. v. OstlindOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Johnson v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Johnson v. CurlOregon Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API