Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cawrse v. American Surety Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The complaint alleges separately four similar causes of action. The first of these avers that the relators, to whom we shall hereafter refer as the plaintiffs, are partners engaged in farming; that the defendant Fischer Warehouse Company is a corporation engaged in the conduct of a licensed public warehouse; that the defendant American Surety Company of New York is engaged in the business of writing surety bonds; and that, October 5, 1926, the warehouse company, as principal, and the surety company, as surety, executed and delivered to the State of Oregon a warehouse bond for the period…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Grand Chute v. WinegarSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Savage v. Salem Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Portland Iron Works v. SiemensOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Dixon v. SimpsonOregon Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Huebener v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Republic Underwriters v. Tillamook Bay Fish Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. LongDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
  4. Jensen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Aetna Insurance Company v. Junction Warehouse CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API