Legal Opinion
Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 26, 2010No. 05-2293PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District (“MRGCD”) challenges a final judgment entered on its cross-claims brought pursuant to the Federal Quiet Title Act of 1972 (the “QTA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, in favor of the Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, the Bureau of Reclamation (“BOR”), BOR officials, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”), and Corps officials (collectively the “federal appellees”). Specifically, following a bench trial, the district court held that MRGCD’s claims were time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(g). The court ruled in the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Baker v. USD 229 Blue ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Ingram v. FaruqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Kane County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.