Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

October Term, 1886, No. 226, W. D., before Gordon, Paxson, Trunkey, Sterrett, Green, and Clark, JJ. Error to the Common Pleas No. 1 of Allegheny County to review a judgment on a verdict directed for defendants in an action of trover. This action was brought by William O. Stewart and Charles E. Stewart against Charles S. Wolfe, William Wolfe, and William Patton, to recover the value of a certain stock of goods alleged to belong to plaintiffs.

Read the full summary

October Term, 1886, No. 226, W. D., before Gordon, Paxson, Trunkey, Sterrett, Green, and Clark, JJ. Error to the Common Pleas No. 1 of Allegheny County to review a judgment on a verdict directed for defendants in an action of trover. This action was brought by William O. Stewart and Charles E. Stewart against Charles S. Wolfe, William Wolfe, and William Patton, to recover the value of a certain stock of goods alleged to belong to plaintiffs. On and prior to January 13, 1883, plaintiffs were carrying on a business of retail and wholesale brush manufactures in Pittsburgh, and were in possession…

1Per curiam

The law of this case was well stated by the court below when it said that the replevin bond given by Riddle was a substitute for the property delivered to him upon it, and that the purchaser from him acquired a good title to the property sued for in this action.

The judgment is affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Katz v. HlavacSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Foerderer v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  4. McCord v. AkeleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API