McCord v. Akeley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Bayfield county: John K. Pabish, Circuit'Judge. This action was commenced against the present defendants and one John E. Hill to recover damages on account of the cutting of timber from the N. W. of section II, township 48 north, range 8 west, in Bayfield county, Wisconsin.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Bayfield county: John K. Pabish, Circuit'Judge. This action was commenced against the present defendants and one John E. Hill to recover damages on account of the cutting of timber from the N. W. of section II, township 48 north, range 8 west, in Bayfield county, Wisconsin. The complaint alleges that defendants Akeley and Sprague, between July 16 and November 15, 1900, unlawfully, and without the consent of the plaintiff, entered upon the premises described and wrongfully cut and removed therefrom all the white and Norway pine timber, and…
1DissentTimlin, J.
The order dissolving the temporary injunction and permitting the defendant Hill “to cut and sell any or all of the timber upon said land or otherwise dispose of the same as he may see fit, upon filing in this court an undertaking with sufficient sureties, to be approved by the judge of this court, in the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500), conditioned,” etc., was dated July 22, 1898. The sale of the timber to Akeley and Sprague under this permission and after the undertaking was given *203was on February 13, 1900. Tbe final judgment in the action of McCord against Hill was July…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Yale v. DuffelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
- Stewart v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1880
- Sobey v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- State ex rel. Bell v. HoustonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884